Prediction of Hank Pfister vs Tony Giammalva Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
H. Pfister vs T. Giammalva

Hank Pfister

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tony Giammalva

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Pfister 1 - 0 Giammalva

They have played 2 sets in total, with Hank Pfister winning 2 and Tony Giammalva winning 0. The last match between Hank Pfister and Tony Giammalva was at the Taipei, 29-10-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Hank Pfister getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pfister	1
Giammalva	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Taipei(10-29-84)

Stats

Hank Pfister

Tony Giammalva

H. Pfister vs T. Giammalva H2H Profile

H. Pfister	Stats	T. Giammalva
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
55.07% (266-217)	Career Total W/L	48.37% (89-95)
1	Indoor	0
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

H. Pfister vs T. Giammalva Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hank Pfister has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tony Giammalva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hank Pfister, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tony Giammalva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Hank Pfister has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tony Giammalva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Hank Pfister has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tony Giammalva winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Hank Pfister has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 96/53), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tony Giammalva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 38/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 8/13).
Player level: In the last year, Hank Pfister has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tony Giammalva has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hank Pfister winning 1 times and Tony Giammalva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hank Pfister winning 2 and Tony Giammalva winning 0.
The last match between Hank Pfister and Tony Giammalva was at the Taipei, 29-10-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Hank Pfister getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hank Pfister has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tony Giammalva has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hank Pfister has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tony Giammalva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Hank Pfister has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tony Giammalva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hank Pfister vs Tony Giammalva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Pfister vs T. Giammalva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

H. Pfister	Stats	T. Giammalva
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

H. Pfister Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R1 Jim GrabbJ. Grabb	L	3-6 6-3 6-4 6-0	Stats
Cincinnati - 17-08-1987
R2 Paul ChamberlinP. Chamberlin	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Montreal / Toronto - 10-08-1987
R2 Michael WestphalM. Westphal	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Orlando - 16-03-1987
R3 Greg HolmesG. Holmes	L	6-7 7-6 7-6	Stats
Key Biscayne - 23-02-1987
R1 Ramesh KrishnanR. Krishnan	L	6-3 7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Giammalva Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 24-06-1985
R1 John FitzgeraldJ. Fitzgerald	L	6-4 7-5 6-1	Stats
Houston - 25-02-1985
R3 David PateD. Pate	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Taipei - 29-10-1984
R3 Van WinitskyV. Winitsky	W	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
R4 Hank PfisterH. Pfister	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 08-10-1984
R2 Drew GitlinD. Gitlin	L	7-6 6-4	Stats

View All

H. Pfister vs T. Giammalva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

H. Pfister	Stats	T. Giammalva
55.04% (262/214)	YTD Win/Loss	48.37% (89/95)
54.02% (651/554)	Sets Win/Loss	50.22% (232/230)
51.28% (5981/5682)	Games Win/Loss	49.60% (2174/2209)
56.40% (97/75)	Hard Win/Loss	51.61% (32/30)
43.14% (22/29)	Clay Win/Loss	52.05% (38/35)
45.63% (47/56)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.29% (11/17)
64.43% (96/53)	Grass Win/Loss	38.10% (8/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
573.18	Average Opponent Rank	601.9
56.92% (37/28)	Slam W/L	37.50% (9/15)
48.39% (15/16)	Masters W/L	28.57% (2/5)
55.17% (208/169)	Main Tour W/L	42.57% (43/58)
66.67% (2/1)	Challenger W/L	67.31% (35/17)
55% (226/408)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (79/159)
55% (36/65)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	43% (10/23)
100% (1/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	75% (3/4)
52% (81/157)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (28/64)
83% (262/218)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (94/74)
17% (262/44)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (94/19)
21% (213/44)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (89/15)